During NFL owner proposal, here is the final steps required ratification to get a CBA in place

|

Much was made yesterday, "a comprehensive agreement" had ratified the NFL owners to get the football season in progress.

But what really happened was that their final proposal to the players - conditions - no agreement ratified the owner (see all details) as the players must still vote, completing the business and take advantage of a CBA available.

The press release from the League had an incredible amount of information in it. But upon reading it is so interesting for what is missing for what it is.

The biggest problem outstanding is the question of the settlement of two important legal cases. You are the antitrust case, which among other things sees Tom Brady, drew Brees, Peyton Manning, plaintiff than lead, and the "lockout insurance" case in which a judge ruled that the NFL TV rights extensions take advantage to reach had negotiated about the player with a lockout. That the contract agreed with the final language, must be resolved. The Board members for the players must agree a settlement, to recommend to approve them then in class of the player in the suit. Then, the Court would have to approve and ratify the settlement.

The other important matter is the NFLPA as Union reconstitution. The Board members of the NFLPA have to recommend for the rest of the player, and then from a technical perspective, go through the process of changes to their own status with the IRS, National Labor Relations Board, and address of its Constitution and by-laws.

From there, the player would vote to ratify the agreement. Owners believe the players can do so electronically, but want the players to carry out the paper choice with signatures, as well as with the vote on desertification to provide adequate care. Take longer to perform would and could be the ratification process will take longer.

Then and only then can the players and owners get past issues such as the treatment of complaints, players use and drug policy.

Thus, it is to say that the owners have ratified a Convention a fallacy. What has happened is a savvy power play to get the player, the final proposal to agree they over matched before it saw the players.

NFL LABOR RELATED CONTENT:

MAURY BROWN to follow you on TWITTER @ BizballMaury

View the original article here